Bradley v. Burkhart
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polh District Court.— HoN. James A. Howe, Judge. This is an action to fix and settle the boundaries of plaintiff’s and defendant’s properties. The trial court found in favor of plaintiff’s contention, and defendant appeals.—
1Opinion of the Court
Deemed, J.—
Lots 1 and 2 in block 1 of Griffith’s subdivision of lot 5 of the Pursley estate, now in the city of Des Moines, run north and south. They are each sixty feet wide, and one hundred and thirty-two feet in length. Plaintiff is the owner of the south one-third of these two lots, and defendant of the middle one-third. Each of their holdings should be forty-four feet north and south by one hundred and twenty feet east and west. This is a controversy over the division or boundary line between the two tracts. It seems that shortly before this action was commenced defendant tore down a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Kitchen v. ChantlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
3Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of JavornikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Kesler v. EllisIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Johnson v. City of ShenandoahSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Carstensen v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Minear v. Keith Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.