Terry v. Mecerle
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sanderson, C. J.
This is an action of ejectment. The case was tried in the Court below without a jury. The plaintiff had judgment, ■and the defendant appeals. The facts as found by the Court are acquiesced in by both parties, and the question to be determined is whether the 2>laintiff, upon those facts, is entitled to recover the land in controversy.. The findings are as follows: “ First—That in January, 1862, the plaintiff obtained from the State of California a patent *621for the land in controversy, pursuant to the several Acts for the disposal of the five hundred thousand acres…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Doe Ex Dem. Patterson v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Doll v. MeadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rondell v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Hastings v. DevlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Megerle v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Megerle v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872