Legal Opinion

KING AND YANG

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1978No. ID 2647PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

interim Decision #2647 MATTER OF KING AND YANG In Deportation Proceedings A-15527215 A-15527216 Decided by Board April 25, 1978 (1) An immigration judge has no authority to grant immunity from criminal prosecution and he cannot reject a valid Fifth Amendment claim by purporting to bind the law enforcement agencies in their freedom to prosecute. (2) The respondents' Oriental appearance, combined with the past history of illegal alien employment at the particular restaurant where they were encountered, and an anonymous tip, gave rise to a reasonable suspicion by a Service officer of alienage…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CARRILLOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API