New York & Minnesota Gold Mining Co. v. Martin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action comes to this Court by an appeal taken by the defendants from an order- of the Court of Common Pleas, Ramsey County, overruling a demurrer, which they had interposed to the plaintiff’s complaint. The ground of de-. murrer was “ that the said- complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” The allegations of the complaint appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Oh. J.
By the Court This case comes before us on - an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The complaint alleges: “That said plaintiff is *419and was on the 24th day of February, A. D. 1866, a corporation duly organized and created under the laws, of the State of New York, by the name of the New York and Minnesota Gold Mining Company; that the object for which said corporation was formed, was the mining and smelting of gold and other ores, and the disposal of the same, and that a portion of its said business was to bo conducted and carried on near Lake Yermillion,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Kipp v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Cook v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880