Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Johnson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1944No. File No. 8587Published

1DissentRoberts, J.

I cannot agree with the majority in holding that the instruction given by the trial court as to alibi evidence is not prejudiciál. The instruction Is quoted in the'majority opinion and need not be repeated.

An alibi is not, accurately speaking, a defense though frequently designated as such. It is merely in rebuttal of the state’s evidence. Although easily fabricated, evidence as to an alibi is nevertheless legitimate and may be the only evidence available to disprove a false accusation. Cases dealing with instructions relating to the effect of failure to prove an alibi are collected in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FergusonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People v. CostelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. RabinowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Henry v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Canty v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API