Legal Opinion
Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnel Douglas Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 1987No. A029367PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.
—McDonnell Douglas Corporation (MDC) sold to Philippine Airlines (PAL) a DC-10 Series aircraft. As relevant to the issues on appeal, MDC warranted under the sales agreement that the aircraft would be free from defects and that the extent of its liability under the warranty was limited to the repair, replacement or correction of any defective part. And at the end of the agreement, just above the signature lines, appeared the following paragraph:
“The warranty and service life policy provided in this article and the obligations and liabilities of seller under said…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Nunes Turfgrass, Inc. v. Vaughan-Jacklin Seed Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Farnham v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.