Legal Opinion
Queens Ballpark Co. v. Vysk Communications
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 8, 2016No. 15 Civ. 5125 (ER)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Ramos, U.S.D.J.
Queens Ballpark Company (“QBC” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendant Vysk Communications (“Vysk”) for breach of contract. Before this Court is Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED.
I. Factual and Procedural Background 1
Plaintiff is a New York company that operates Citi Field, the home ballpark of the New York Mets. Statement of Material Facts in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (“Pl. 56.1 Stmt”) (Doc. 48) ¶ 1. Defendant…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Avalanche IP, LLC v. FAM, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Avalanche IP, LLC v. FAM, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund v. Sanders Construction, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Catalano v. MarineMaxDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- DeBernardo v. Lowe's Home CentersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.