Legal Opinion
(PC) Barnett v. Fisher, Jr.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 7, 2020No. 1:17-cv-01361Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DELBERT BARNETT, Case No. 1:17-cv-01361-DAD-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION 13 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 14 R. FISHER, JR., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 Defendant. (Docs. 42, 43) 16 17 Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 42, 43.) For 18 the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that Defendant’s motion be granted and that 19 Plaintiff’s motion be denied. 20 I. LEGAL STANDARD 21 Summary judgment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.