Legal Opinion

Security National Bank v. Gunderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1927No. File No. 6095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MiISER, C.

The promissory note in suit contains the following language:

“The makers, indorsers, and guarantors of this note, and the sureties hereon, severally waive presentment for payment, protest and notice of dishonor, and consent that the time of its payment may be extended without notice, 'all defenses on the -ground of any extension of time of payment being hereby expressly waived.”

Appellant contends that the note is non-negotiable because this clause offends against the requirement of both sections 1708 and 1886, Rev. Code 1919, that a note be payable at a determinable future time. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. KenneyTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Farmer v. Bank of GraettingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. First National Bank v. ButteryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McDonald v. MulkeyWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Russell v. WyantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. BottolfsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Sioux National Bank v. LundbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. First State Bank v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API