Legal Opinion

Strawser v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1992No. 91-139PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

In granting a petition for writ of certio-rari in a case of first impression for Wyoming, we must decide whether petitioners’ counsel is entitled to conduct ex parte interviews with a corporation’s present and former employees in an action claiming defamation and invasion of privacy. In reaching our decision, we are invited to examine Rule 4.2 of the Wyoming Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law and the various “tests” adopted in other jurisdictions which govern adverse litigant ex parte discovery interviews with present and past corporate employees.

In…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Farr v. LinkWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. SandstromWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Continental Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. McCallum v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
  4. Brown v. St. Joseph CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  5. Baisley v. Missisquoi Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API