Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Haws
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 25, 1987No. 2-85-247-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOE SPURLOCK, II, Justice.
Appellants, Thomas Byrne Reynolds, his wife, and other home owners, seek reversal of a trial court judgment which dismissed with prejudice their petition for judicial review of a decision of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Fort Worth (“Board”). We affirm the judgment.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, are homeowners in Fort Worth who opposed a zoning exception and variance. Russell M. Haws and James W. Schell had requested the variance and exception to build an auxiliary parking lot on a piece of land located in appellants’ neighborhood.
Because this case was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of San Angelo v. Boehme BakeryTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Castleberry v. Goolsby Building Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Scott v. Board of AdjustmentTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- McDonald v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nuchia v. Woodruff, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Cox v. Union Oil Co. of California, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
- Tellez v. City of Socorro, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- Pearce v. City of Round Rock, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Salazar v. Gallardo, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.