Legal Opinion

Territory v. Achuck

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1930No. 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, C. J.

Tlie present appellant, together with one David L. Desha, and six others, were jointly indicted for the crime of conspiracy. The appellant and Desha were tried separately from the six others. Desha was acquitted and the appellant was convicted, the verdict reading: “We, the jury * * * find James Achuck guilty in the third count only and recommend extreme leniency.” Subsequently a nolle prosequi was entered as to the six others and they were discharged. The appellant by writ of error assigns a number of alleged errors.

A demurrer to the third count of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gambino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. MiguelHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Territory v. ScullyHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In re AbreuHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Tong Kai v. Territory of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stapleton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. KelseyHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Stapleton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. KelseyHawaii Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API