Legal Opinion

People v. Lamb

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1972No. Crim. 20437PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

Defendant and Robert Gonzales were jointly charged with: (count I) possession of heroin for sale, in violation of section 11500.5 of the Health and Safety Code; and (count II) possession of methadone, in violation of section 11500, of that code. After a trial to the court, defendant was found guilty on both counts; Gonzales was found guilty, under count I, of the lesser and included offense of possession of heroin and was acquitted on count II. Proceedings under the Narcotics Rehabilitation Act were instituted as to defendant, and he was committed to the Rehabilitation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. CisnerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. VanceHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. OttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. People v. LaJociesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. People v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API