Teed v. Borough of Roseland

Pee Cueiam.

This writ brings before us for review the proceedings and judgment of the mayor and council of the borough of Rose-land, dismissing from office the prosecutor as borough recorder.

The return to the writ shows that at the organization meeting of the borough on January 1st, 1928, the prosecutor was nominated as borough recorder “for the ensuing year,” and such nomination was confirmed by the borough council.

*44At a meeting of May 35th, 1938, the chairman of the public safety committee presented a draft of a letter addressed to the prosecutor defining or attempting to define his duties,…