Legal Opinion

Moore v. Ennis

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 17, 1932Published

1Per curiam

The present proceeding was instituted under section 4 of the Quo Warranto act (3 Comp. Stat., p. 4212), which provides: “Whenever it is alleged that any person usurps, intrudes into or unlawfully holds or executes any municipal office or franchise within this state, any citizen of this state, *1132who believes himself lawfully entitled to such office or franchise, may, as relator, file in the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court an information in the nature of a quo warranto, against such person, for usurping, intruding into or unlawfully holding or executing any such office or franchise, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. MyersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  2. Teed v. Borough of RoselandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  3. Brodman v. RadeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  4. Randolph v. City of RahwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  5. Weinberger v. HilfmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API