Moore v. Ennis
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The present proceeding was instituted under section 4 of the Quo Warranto act (3 Comp. Stat., p. 4212), which provides: “Whenever it is alleged that any person usurps, intrudes into or unlawfully holds or executes any municipal office or franchise within this state, any citizen of this state, *1132who believes himself lawfully entitled to such office or franchise, may, as relator, file in the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court an information in the nature of a quo warranto, against such person, for usurping, intruding into or unlawfully holding or executing any such office or franchise, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. MyersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Teed v. Borough of RoselandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
- Brodman v. RadeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Randolph v. City of RahwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Weinberger v. HilfmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930