Legal Opinion

Halliburton Company and Continental Casualty Company v. Norton Drilling Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 30, 1963No. 19043PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for rehearing en banc is hereby denied. The petition is based principally on the basis that the judgment of this Court is in conflict with our prior judgment in Travelers Insurance Company v. Busy Electric Company, 5 Cir., 294 F.2d 139. We conclude that there is no conflict in the decisions, principally because in the Busy Electric Company case it was alleged by the third-party plaintiff, the defendant in the original suit, that the third-party defendant had executed a contract of indemnity to the third-party plaintiff. No such contract is alleged in the present suit. However,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Appalachian Corp. v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Travelers Insurance Company v. Busy Electric Company, Z. Kermit Remy and Raymond VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. Kahn v. Urania Lumber CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc. v. Delta Marine Drilling Company, Delta Marine Drilling Company v. Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Parfait v. Jahncke Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Julius Ducre v. The Executive Officers of Halter Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Delta Engineering Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Hebert v. BlankenshipLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API