Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1995No. 1993-2385PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 325.] HURST, EXR., APPELLEE, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, APPELLANT. [Cite as Hurst v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.,

1995-Ohio-68.] Torts—Wrongful death, negligence and negligence per se—Parole violator participate in beating death of a person—Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction not guilty of negligence per se, when—Public duty rule applies to bar liability on part of Adult Parole Authority, when. (No. 93-2385—Submitted February 8, 1995—Decided June 21, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hurst v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Crawford v. State, Division of Parole & Community ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Sheperd v. AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Estate of Tokes v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Machlup v. BowmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API