Legal Opinion
State v. Dick
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided June 1, 2012No. 20100310-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ORME, Judge:
T1 Defendant appeals his several convie-tions, most of which concern illegal possession of a controlled substance. After Defendant was tried and sentenced, he moved for a new trial, alleging that the State had withheld evidence regarding a rebuttal witness in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). The trial court denied that motion. Defendant appeals that ruling and further asserts that the State violated rule 16 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure.
12 "When reviewing a trial court's denial of a motion for a new…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. PinderUtah Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DeJesusUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RedcapCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. DeJesusUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. PerazaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020