Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. Kuehn

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1967No. 8344PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

This quiet title action was instituted by Ethel Kuehn, a widow, against Daniel H. and Naomi W. Higginbotham, his wife, seeking title by adverse possession to a one and one-half foot strip of property. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Kuehn and the Higginbothams appealed.

Since the only serious questions concern the sufficiency of the evidence, the facts will be stated and taken in a light most favorable to support the judgment. Chadwick v. Winn, 101 Ariz. 533, 421 P.2d 890.

Prior to 1943, the property of both appellants and appellee was owned by Tom Caldwell…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spillsbury v. School District No. 19Arizona Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gusheroski v. LewisArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Trevillian v. RaisArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Chadwick v. WinnArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Gunther & Shirley Co. v. Presbytery of Los AngelesArizona Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tenney v. LuplowArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Inch v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Kay v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Chandler v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API