Bader v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
No statement necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
Appellant was charged by indictment with forgery and with uttering and passing a forged instrument» The court in his charge limited the consideration of the jury to the second count, and the jury found appellant guilty of uttering a forged instrument, and fixed the penalty at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.
There is but one bill of exceptions, which insists that the second count, charging the uttering of a forged instrument, alleges and sets forth in haec verba, the check on the Commercial Bank of Mason, as follows: “Mason, Texas, Nov. 11, 1901. No. —.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- De Alberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WaterburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Whorton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Rayburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917