Legal Opinion

Bader v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1902No. 2416PublishedCited by 5 opinions

No statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment with forgery and with uttering and passing a forged instrument» The court in his charge limited the consideration of the jury to the second count, and the jury found appellant guilty of uttering a forged instrument, and fixed the penalty at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

There is but one bill of exceptions, which insists that the second count, charging the uttering of a forged instrument, alleges and sets forth in haec verba, the check on the Commercial Bank of Mason, as follows: “Mason, Texas, Nov. 11, 1901. No. —.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Alberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WaterburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Whorton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Rayburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API