People v. Blume
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Egan Jr., J.
*1026We affirm. The various arguments raised by defendant are either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit. As to the *1027asserted Wade violation, County Court indicated that it would not be conducting a Wade hearing with respect to defendant because, as noted previously, the victim was unable to identify defendant as one of his attackers and the People did not intend to pursue any such identification testimony at trial. Defendant voiced no objection to County Court’s ruling and, therefore, his present argument is unpreserved for our review {see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Belle,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. WesterNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. ShanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. FineoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.