Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jenad, Inc. v. Village of Scarsdale

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1966Published

1DissentVan Voorhis, J.

The principle of decision in this case would constitutionally allow municipal officers to prohibit real estate development in cities, towns and villages unless the newcomers pay '¡whatever sums of money the local public authorities may decide arbitrarily to impose upon them for the privilege of moving into the community, to be spent on schools, public buildings, police and fire protection, parks and recreation or any other general municipal purpose past, present or to come, and without relation to special benefits or assessed valuation. The comment is apt by the late Chief Justice Vanderbilt,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. Village of Mount ProspectIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Rosen v. Village of Downers GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Haugen v. GLEASONOregon Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API