Polson v. . Strickland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
This was an action to recover of defendants a Eord automobile. Tbe ancillary proceeding or provisional remedy of claim and delivery was resorted to, and tbe Eord automobile seized, and defendants gave replevin or undertaking as required by tbe statute. C. S., 836.
Plaintiff prayed, in substance, that be be declared tbe owner and entitled to tbe immediate possession of a Eord car, describing it, and that be recover of tbe defendants J. M. Strickland and tbe Texas Oil Company, and their surety, M. J. Hedrick, tbe cost of this action, to be taxed by tbe clerk; but if for any reason tbe possession…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Greene v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Harrell v. . TrippSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Federal Finance & Credit Co. v. TeeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Boyd v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Nash v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931