Legal Opinion

Boyd v. . Walters

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1931Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

Tbe record contains no statement of case on appeal, bence we are limited to a consideration of tbe judgment, tbe appeal. itself being regarded as an exception thereto. Casualty Co. v. Green, 300 N. C., 535, 157 S. E., 797.

Agreeably to tbe requirements of C. S., 836, tbe tenor of tbe defendant’s forthcoming bond is to tbe effect that, if tbe plaintiff be adjudged tbe owner and entitled to tbe recovery of tbe possession of tbe property described in tbe plaintiff’s affidavit, tbe defendant and bis surety bind themselves for tbe delivery thereof to tbe plaintiff, with damages for its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. A. McA. Council v. AverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Hall v. . TillmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Orange Trust Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. McCormick v. . CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API