Legal Opinion
Riggs v. Home Builders Institute
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 2002No. 01CV0412PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Frank Riggs has sued his former employer, Home Builders Institute (“HBI”), its affiliate, the National Association of Home Builders (“NAHB”), and two NAHB officers, Thomas Downs and Robert Mitchell, for wrongful termination, tor-tious interference with contract and prospective advantage, and civil conspiracy. Defendants HBI, NAHB, Downs, and Mitchell have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Upon careful consideration of the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Brown v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Parnigoni v. ST. COLUMBA'S NURSERY SCHOOLDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Davis v. Gables Residential/H.G. SmithyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.