Legal Opinion

People v. Lemmons

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1976PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.

Defendants Melvin Lemmons, Raymond Hardrick, Samuel Allen and Jane Doe1 were convicted, after a jury trial, of two counts of possession of a dangerous weapon, two loaded revolvers. The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting in part, affirmed the judgments of conviction, without opinion. (49 AD2d 639.) On this appeal, all four defendants argue that their motion to suppress the weapons on constitutional grounds should have been granted. In addition, defendants Lemmons, Hardrick and Allen contest the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting their convictions. There should be an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. People v. LypkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. LeyvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. OsorioNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. FinlaysonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Matthews v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API