Legal Opinion
Vessell v. DPS Associates of Charleston, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 8, 1998No. 97-1484PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge ERVIN wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge MICHAEL joined.
OPINION
ERVIN, Circuit Judge:
This case comes before us on the district court’s grant of judgment as a matter of law for the defendant-appellee, DPS Associates, a real estate agency doing business as Re/Max Professional Realty (“Re/Max”). The plaintiff-appellant, George Vessell, had claimed breach of contract under state law and retaliatory discharge under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (1994). The district court correctly found that any contract between Vessell…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Player v. ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Benner v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Edens v. Laurel Hill, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Science Applications International Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Vessell v. Dps Associates Of Charleston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Gilbert v. Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023