Legal Opinion

Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Western Electric Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 6, 1907No. 64PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. On petition of Sterling-Meaker Company to intervene.

1Per curiam

This is a petition presented by the Sterling-Meaker Company, after this cause was reached on the regular call of the calendar and is ready for argument, asking that the petitioner be permitted to intervene, and that the cause be remanded to the Circuit Court to take testimony upon the question of the complainant’s laches. The petitioner was fully informed of the pendency of this action, and declined an opportunity to intervene when the case was pending in the Circuit Court.

The basis of this application is collusion between the parties to the suit. Upon an examination of the record we are…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ball & Roller Bearing Co. v. F. C. Sanford Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  2. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. LaemmleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1914
  3. Smith v. American Asiatic Underwriters, Federal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  4. Standard Parts Co. v. Cleveland Welding & Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
  5. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Sterling-Meaker Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API