Legal Opinion

Bass v. Buker

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, Second District, Missoula County. Proceedings to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtBaoh, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The grounds upon which the- motion for a new trial was based are (1) insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision and judgment of the court; (2) that said decision and judgment are against the law.

The statement on the motion for a new trial does not specify the particulars in which the evidence is alleged to be insufficient, therefore we cannot consider that question. *443‘ See subd. 3, § 287, Code Civil Proc.; Taylor v. Holter, 2 Mont. 477.

Second, that tbe decision and judgment are against tbe law.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warren v. Van BruntSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. McCue v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
  3. Brewster v. MaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Jones v. TainterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  5. Woodbury v. DormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stark v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Stewart v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. McLeod v. DickensonMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Norris v. HealdMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Selway v. DautMontana Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API