Legal Opinion

In re Kelly

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 18, 2012No. Nos. 29210-0-III; 29746-2-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 The trial court summarily dismissed a suit to establish the existence of a committed intimate relationship (CIR). The court concluded that suit had to be brought within three years of the end of the relationship and here it was not. We agree with the holding and therefore affirm the dismissal, but we reverse the award of attorney fees and costs.

FACTS

¶2 Bette Lyn Kelly and Peter Moesslang began living together in 1984. From 1986 to 2006, they lived in a house in Liberty Lake, Washington. They dispute when their *727relationship ended. Ms. Kelly urges that it ended in 2006. She says that they…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of Richard Todd Wixom & Linda Buchholz WixomCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Christine Amburgey, V Christopher VolkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Charles M. Mcbeth v. Ruby E. KetschauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Leonard Carpenter Dewitt v. Kevin William HannanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Maria A. Pena Avila v. Gumersindo Quin CamposCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API