Legal Opinion
Ford v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided April 10, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
The Roxana Petroleum Corporation is the assignee of mineral leases from H. M. Ford and wife to 640 acres of land in Young county, Tex. It transferred certain portions thereof to Atkinson & Sandefer. One of such transfers was a triangle shaped tract south and east of a railroad which eater-comered through the Ford survey; another tract contained 60 acres in what is known as the northeast corner of the south 160 acres of the north 320 acres; another is a 20-aere tract in the northwest comer of the south 160 acres of the north 320 acres. After the institution of this suit,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Schulz v. Frank Tessman & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
- Yulee v. VoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. ColeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waldron v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1951
- Kincheloe v. HopkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1933
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
- Swartz v. Cleveland Worm & Gear Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1949