Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Howie

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 15, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The record shows that during the pendency of the suit the plaintiff, Ben Hemit, died, and that the suit was revived in the name of a special administrator of his estate, and also in the name of his attorney, J. R. Wilson.

It is first sought to sustain the revivor on the ground that Wilson, as attorney for the plaintiff, had a lien on the fruits of the litigation, and was entitled to protect and enforce his lien. At the outset it may be stated that, independently of statute, an attorney at law, who has performed services and expended moneys in prosecuting or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Singer v. NaronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Carson v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BlaylockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Hershy v. DuVal & CravensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rye v. BaumannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  2. Bowers v. RightsellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Johnson v. Commonwealth Bldg. Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Hardin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Schwab v. WyssSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API