Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Octapharma Plasma
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided August 28, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00514Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION BREANNA HAYNES Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:24-cv-00514-RGJ OCTAPHARMA PLASMA, INC. Defendant * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Octapharma Plasma, Inc., (“Octapharma”) moves to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and 12(b)(6). Pro Se Plaintiff Breanna Haynes (“Haynes”) responded, [DE 10] and Octapharma replied. [DE 11]. This matter is ripe. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Octapharma’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Haynes was hired as a phlebotomist by Octapharma on August 25,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.