Paul Jones v. IPX Int'l Equatorial Guinea SA
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
Paul Jones is a United States citizen who chose to make his money abroad. In good times, he was happy to invest, work, and live in Equatorial Guinea. But when business soured, he hoped the United States would sweeten the deal. That hope did not pan out. After Jones sued his employer in the Eastern District of Michigan, the district court dismissed his complaint under the doctrine of forum non conveniens . Jones now asks us to reverse that decision. We are unconvinced that there was a clear abuse of discretion. We AFFIRM .
I
Paul Jones is a Michigan citizen who has worked…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mcpherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Hassan El-Fadl v. Central Bank of JordanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Firexo, Inc. v. Firexo Group LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Prevent USA Corp. v. Volkswagen AGCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Anil Kumar Katakam v. Anil Kumar Reddy HunasenahallyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- AtriCure, Inc. v. MengDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.