DIRECTV Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is DIRECTV Group, Inc.’s (“DIRECTV’s”) motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS DIRECTV’s motion.
*304FACTS
I. Background Precedent
This case is another in the series of cases involving the implementation of the original Cost Accounting Standard (“CAS”) 413.50(c), 48 C.F.R. § 9904.413-50(c)(12) (1994) (“CAS 413” or “original CAS 413”),1 which was promulgated in 1977 and then substantially revised in 1995. See 48 C.F.R. §…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- National State Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Community Guardian Bank Uniport Company, Inc. Sang B. Lee Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Telemac Cellular Corporation v. Topp Telecom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Directv Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- CBS Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Directv Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Directv Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012