Joyner v. Holland
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentMyers, Associate Judge
(dissenting) :
I must disagree with my associates’ decision upholding imposition of liability by the trial court upon appellant under the Automobile Financial Responsibility Act (40 D.C.Code, 1961 § 424).
The majority opinion recites the common law rule that “proof that the automobile was owned by the defendant at the time of the accident establishes a prima facie case for the plaintiff.” This rule was laid down in Curry v. Stevenson, 58 App.D.C. 162, 163, 26 F.2d 534, 535 (1928), a case decided before the statute in question was enacted *543and involving singular ownership of the vehicle involved.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Fox v. LavenderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Curry v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.