Legal Opinion

People v. Ortega

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 2015No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA1340PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE WEBB

1 Everyone agrees that the Fifth Amendment prohibits compelling a defendant's testimony, but does not preclude evidence of the defendant's physical characteristics, Still, where a trial court orders a defendant to speak solely for voice identification by the jury, does the procedure involve improper testimonial or proper physical evidence? And even if the identification involves only physical evidence, is the procedure impermis-sibly suggestive because the jury hears only the defendant's voice? These questions are unresolved in Colorado,

T2 A jury convicted Ramon Anthony…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Eric J. MonaghanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. People v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. v. ThamesColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. People v. RobersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. People v. JaquezColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Peo v. JayneColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. People v. RobersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API