Ounan v. Commonwealth

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Claimant Francis J. Ounan alleges that the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review capriciously disregarded competent evidence in determining that his voluntary separation from employment was not compensable because it was without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature, as required by Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.1

Claimant was a private investigator with ten years’ service in a Philadelphia law firm. Claimant testified that he left the firm because of the counter*434manding and conflicting orders that he received from different partners,…