Penkola v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
Paul W. Penkola (claimant) brings this appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referee’s denial of unemployment compensation. Both the referee and the Board concluded that Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 (Law) made the claimant ineligible to receive compensation because he had voluntarily left work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature.
The claimant had been employed by United Parcel Service for approximately thirty-nine months, and had held a supervisory position during the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pfafman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Nolte v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wasko v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Willet v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Martin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Lawlor v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Karloff v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.