Legal Opinion

Burlington Insurance v. Rivers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1894No. 1059PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEY, Associate Justice.

— Appellee sued and recovered upon a fire insurance policy. A general demurrer to his petition was overruled, and error is assigned upon this ruling.

1.' The policy enumerates a number of different circumstances in which it is stated the company will not be liable; among which is the following: “This company shall not be liable for loss by theft at or after a fire, nor from loss caused by invasion, insurrection, riot, civil commotion, military or usurped power.” The petition alleged, that the property insured was totally destroyed by fire; but did not negative the fact…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Continental Life Insurance v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Cohen v. Continental Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Niagara Insurance v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Pelican Insurance v. Troy Co-operative Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. HarrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. International Travelers Ass'n v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. American Ins. Co. of Newark v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Ginners' Mut. Underwriters of San Angelo v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp. v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API