Burlington Insurance v. Rivers
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KEY, Associate Justice.
— Appellee sued and recovered upon a fire insurance policy. A general demurrer to his petition was overruled, and error is assigned upon this ruling.
1.' The policy enumerates a number of different circumstances in which it is stated the company will not be liable; among which is the following: “This company shall not be liable for loss by theft at or after a fire, nor from loss caused by invasion, insurrection, riot, civil commotion, military or usurped power.” The petition alleged, that the property insured was totally destroyed by fire; but did not negative the fact…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Continental Life Insurance v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Cohen v. Continental Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Niagara Insurance v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Pelican Insurance v. Troy Co-operative Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. HarrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- International Travelers Ass'n v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- American Ins. Co. of Newark v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Ginners' Mut. Underwriters of San Angelo v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Employer's Liability Assurance Corp. v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.