Legal Opinion
Vermeulen v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided May 15, 1980No. 1:07-m-00008PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HIRAM H. WARD, District Judge.
This case is before the Court for rulings on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. The plaintiff James Vermeulen 1 has sued the defendant Pension Fund to recover pension benefits. Jurisdiction is asserted under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the Court will deny the plaintiff’s motion and grant the defendant’s motion.
The parties do not dispute the facts material to their motions. The plaintiff Vermeulen was a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Malone v. White Motor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- William J. Riley v. Meba Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- James J. Reiherzer v. Daniel J. Shannon, and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- William H. Nolan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Richard B. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Snyder v. TitusDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
- Milton Van Fossan v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Union Local No. 710 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Sharron v. Amalgamated Insurance Agency Services., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Dudo v. SchafferDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Reklau v. Merchants National Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.