Legal Opinion

Cornish v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 30, 2018No. 12/18Published

1Opinion of the Court

Argued Before: Barbera, C.J. Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ.

Greene, J.

**521 *1238 In this case, we consider under what circumstances a defendant has the right to a hearing upon filing a Maryland Rule 4-331(c) Motion for New Trial based on newly discovered evidence. More specifically, we must decide whether the trial judge was legally correct in denying Petitioner Ronald Cornish ("Mr. Cornish") a hearing under the Rule. Petitioner was charged and convicted of first degree murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, and other related offenses. Thereafter,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Buck v. Cam's Broadloom Rugs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Douglas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Yorke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API