Legal Opinion

Stephen Shoemaker v. Robert Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2013No. 11-56476PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed on August 6, 2013 is amended as follows:

On slip opinion page 5, line 4, remove the following text:

< Other than the eight images that formed the basis of Shoemaker’s child pornography convictions, the seized images were adult rather than child pornography^

On page 5, line 4, insert the following text:

< Eight of those images formed the basis for Shoemaker’s child pornography convictions. >

An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.

No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.

OPINION

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

A California jury…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael GrzybowiczCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. State v. BollesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Richard Boyer v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. HillieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Jeffrey AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API