Dingeldein v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Two principles applicable to this case, must now be deemed as settled: First, that in a contract between A and B, wherein B assumes and undertakes, upon a good consideration from A, to pay a certain sum of money to C, the latter may maintain an action against B to recover the money, and this, although the arrangement was originally made without his knowledge or assent. This principle has been established, both where personal property was the subject of the contract, and where real estate was conveyed, upon which there was a mortgage, the amount of which the grantee promised that he would pay…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burr v. . BeersNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Belmont v. . ComanNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Perley v. ParkerSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1850
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kelly v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Milbank v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Gerdine v. MenageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Gill's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Concrete Inv. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.