Legal Opinion
Dick v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 7, 1949No. 48879PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff sues for the value of two propellers, spare parts and patterns furnished the United States Coast Guard, the value of which he alleges to have been $59,275.
*327Briefly the petition alleges that during the period involved the Coast Guard was under the jurisdiction of the Navy; that prior to 1944 the Navy and the Coast Guard jointly designed a new type of propeller for use on icebreaking vessels; that on June 30, 1944, the plaintiff agreed to manufacture and furnish to the Navy one shipset of the new propeller equipment including two propellers, spare blades and hubs,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- First National Bank of Murfreesboro v. First National Bank of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Traders' Nat. Bank v. First Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by15 opinions
- Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Best Foam Fabricators, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Rhode Island Tool Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Morrison v. ThoelkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Reserve Insurance v. DuckettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.