Legal Opinion
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided July 2, 1985No. 83-1569PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
473 U.S. 614 (1985)
MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP.
v.
SOLER CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC.
No. 83-1569.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 18, 1985
Decided July 2, 1985[*]
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Wayne A. Cross argued the cause for petitioner in No. 83-1569 and respondent in No. 83-1733. With him on the briefs were Robert L. Sills, William I. Sussman, Samuel T. Cespedes, and Ana Matilde Nin.
Benjamin Rodriguez-Ramon argued the cause for respondent in No. 83-1569 and petitioner in No. 83-1733. With him on the briefs was Jerome Murray.
Jerrold Joseph Ganzfried…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Blackmun; Dissent.
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Martinez v. Vision Precision Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Snipes v. Dollar Tree Distribution, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Villa v. Gruma CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020