Legal Opinion

Dutterer v. Logan

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1927No. 5821 & 5821-APublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:

The purposes of both suits are substantially the same: the first to enforce a forfeiture of all estate, rights and interests, of defendants Bessie M. Royer, Virginia F. Zinn, S. Alberta Flynn, and R. Stanley Dutterer, as devisees of the several tracts of land and interests therein devised to them by the will of the late Jacob H. Dutterer, in favor of the plaintiff J. Henry Dutterer and the defendant Flora K. Logan, the other devisees under the will, pursuant to a provision thereof, and to divide and partition said lands between them; the second, to enforce said forfeiture as to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Porter v. MackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Tate v. CampTennessee Supreme Court · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Calvery v. CalveryTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Rudd v. SearlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Womble v. GunterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API