Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 24, 1982No. [No. 24, September Term, 1981.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

In this case the issue we shall decide is whether a statement made by the accused to a probation officer conducting a presentence investigation at the direction of the trial court is admissible in a subsequent trial for purposes of impeachment.

The parties agreed upon the pertinent facts. On March 6, 1979, Willard and Lorraine Sheppard, along with their son, Stanley, were present in their Bethesda jewelry store, when, at about 11:15 a.m., a well-dressed man came to the door. The door, which was equipped with a lock operated by means of a buzzer, was opened by Stanley Sheppard and the man…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Rubin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API