Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sharp County Sheriff's Department v. Ozark Acres Improvement District

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 2001No. CA 01-210Published

1DissentWendell L. Griffen, Judge

The controlling issue in this case is whether the fact that the County did not provide direct compensation to Slater serves to negate the District’s claim that the County was Slater’s special employer via an express or implied contract for hire. I believe it does not.

The County and the District agreed that Slater sustained a compensable injury for which he received medical treatment and a fifteen percent permanent impairment rating to his knee. The District, through its insurance company, initially accepted Slater’s claim and paid for Slater’s knee surgery in the amount of $9,238 in medical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hale v. KempIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Daniels v. Riley's Health & Fitness CentersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Sonners, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Croston v. Montefiore HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API