Legal Opinion

Maddux v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2019No. 15-CT-1195Published

1Opinion of the Court

Glickman, Associate Judge:

Chauncey Maddux appeals the denial of his post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea to one count of driving under the influence of alcohol or a drug (DUI). To prevail, he must demonstrate that permitting his plea to stand will result in manifest injustice.

Mr. Maddux's central claim of such injustice is that the magistrate judge "supplanted the plea bargaining process and coerced him to plead guilty by threatening that she would exercise her discretion to detain him if he stuck by his decision to go to trial, signaling that his only way to avoid that penalty…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API